Outer Rim Territories

Musings, ramblings, and nonsense from the fringe of space and time

« Back to blog

Hypocrite?

GetReligion: November 13, 2006

Media_httpdizzysoundn_ehzhf
What’s so interesting about this story and so many others that deal with the “root causes of homosexuality” is the underlying assumption that an individual who engages in both heterosexual and homosexual behavior is, well, obviously and unequivocally gay. Take Ted Haggard. Here is a man who has been married to a woman for decades and has five children. He also, allegedly, paid a man for sex for three years. Isn’t it interesting that so many people assume that combination means he’s gay? You bake one loaf of bread, it doesn’t mean you’re considered a baker, but for some reason we think differently about sexuality. But only in one direction — men in homosexual relationships who’ve slept with — or even been married to — women aren’t considered straight. Anyway, what’s missing from the whole Denver Post article is the view of some Christians that homosexuality — whether or not it is genetically influenced or some product of cultural influences — is not the best expression of God’s plan for sexual desire. The absence of that information or perspective makes the rest of the article — which more or less condemns evangelical efforts to assist homosexuals in modifying their behavior — ring hollow.
Is Ted Haggard a hypocrite? Perhaps... Here's the definition of one:
hypocrisy |hiˈpäkrisē| noun ( pl. -sies) the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. ORIGIN Middle English : from Old French ypocrisie, via ecclesiastical Latin, from Greek hupokrisis ‘acting of a theatrical part,’ from hupokrinesthai ‘play a part, pretend,’ from hupo ‘under’ + krinein ‘decide, judge.’
As Mollie Ziegler notes, Mr. Haggard isn't play acting. He struggles with sin like everyone else. The truth is not condemned by his succombing to sin. He is condemned for sin. The truth remains intact and whole, unblemished by one man's action. Mr. Haggard seems to fit the modern definition of hypocrite. But look at the derivation of the word "hypocrisy." Do you honestly believe that he was only acting, pretending that homosexuality is sinful because he has engaged in the acts of the sin? Or does he struggle with sin just as Paul says in Romans 7:13-25: "For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil that I will not to do, that I practice." Really, the whole of chapter 7 and Romans deals with this issue of the evil old Adam having what seems the upper hand over the new Adam. Hypocrite? Not really. Sinner? Absolutely. And I? No different that Mr. Haggard.

Nov 13, 2006
Jason Evans Groth said...
Funny that this came up today -- my wife and I watched /Saved/ last night, which deals with the idea of homosexuality and Christianity. Because one engages in sexual acts with another of the same sex does not mean they are gay. A better way to say "Sexual Orientation" is "Sexual Preference." Mr. Haggard preferred having sex (on meth, don't forget), with a man for three years. That's not saying he preferred it to having sex with his wife, he just preferred it to having sex with his wife /only/. As much as my father, my grandparents, my bigoted friends, and all of my Christian acquaintances say it, I cannot believe that homosexuality is a sin. Chris, you are using your hated "relativism" in not admitting that Mr. Haggard had homosexual tendencies. He may not be "gay," but for three years he practiced homosexuality -- and while I don't find that to be a problem, what I do find to be a problem is that he was cheating on his wife while he did it and was also engaging in drug use, and lying about it. A hypocrite does what a hypocrite says one shouldn't do. Mr. Haggard is aligned with a bigoted administration that wanted to amend the Constitution to not allow gay people to marry. Mr. Haggard is aligned with an administration that continues a deleriously unsuccessful "war" on drugs. Mr. Haggard, by having sex with a man for three years, and by engaging in drug use for whenever, is a sinner AND a hypocrite.

God forgives both things. I think a lot more people would find Christianity, and the whole idea of Jesus Christ, a lot more in line with itself if people like Mr. Haggard would simply admit that, yes, they were being hypocritical, and they are sorry.

Nov 13, 2006
Christopher Gillespie said...
Well said. I was trying to make a semantic argument, that is, hypocrite as one who is intentionally leading others astray. Our use of modern use of hypocrite would definately include Mr. Haggard and myself, that is, one who doesn't practice what he preaches.

Mr. Haggard's response to the allegations leaves much to be desired. His theology of attainable holiness definitely puts him in a bind. For he preached that one could stop sinning and yet he himself could not.

I had no intention to overlook the other flagrant abuses which took place. They too are worthy of condemnation under God's law. I intented merely to focus on our use of the word "hypocrite" in provocative way.

Last week in bible class, the eighty-year-old-plus widows and I decided (!) we were all hypocrites. Indeed, it is true.

As to arguments for/against homosexuality, that will have to wait until another time. God's vision for Christian love and marriage doesn't include homosexuality regardless of argumentation about specific prohibitions, Biblical events, or apostolic writings. Those sources only help illuminate the argument. Of course to make the fundamental arguments about God's vision, we'd have a lengthy post... no time for that now....finals week is calling!

Nov 15, 2006
Christopher Gillespie said...
Complements of Pr. Alms:

From: FIRST THINGS: On the Square

The Greek word represented by this kind of “passion” is pathos. It means “suffering.” It is because we are helpless in our suffering that Christ came. He took on vulnerable human form and went into the realm of death and defeated the Evil One. Now we are invited to gradually return to health by fully assimilating the truth that sets us free—by assimilating the presence and life of Christ himself. “It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me,” St. Paul said. This life fills and changes us like fire fills a piece of coal.

In the Eastern Christian understanding, sins are not “bad deeds” that must be made up in order to satisfy justice. They are instead like bad fruit, which indicates a sickness inside the tree (the analogy Jesus uses in Matthew 7:7–8). Sin is infection, not infraction. And God not only forgives freely but also sent his Son to rescue us when we were helpless.

and from:FIRST THINGS: On the Square

A man is not a hypocrite because he violates a moral norm in which he sincerely believes. President Clinton, I am sure, believes that adultery is wrong, and he violated the norm against it in his dalliance with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky; but this made him an adulterer, not a hypocrite. Similarly, decent parents think they ought to be patient with their children, but an overworked mother who snaps at her child at the end of a long day is guilty of impatience, not hypocrisy. Violating norms we sincerely accept does not make us hypocrites. If it did, hypocrisy would not be a peculiar kind of wrongdoing but a concomitant of all wrongdoing.
Wrongdoing like that in my examples is not hypocrisy because it flows from weakness, not malice. Contrary to our sincere intentions and wishes, we sometimes do things we know to be wrong. Immediately after doing them, we acknowledge, at least to ourselves, that we have done wrong. We wish we had not done wrong, and we intend to do better next time. Unless we live in one of the stricter religious communities, we do not announce these faults to the world; rather, for various reasons—some good, some bad, depending on the circumstances—we may even conceal them. All this makes us weak, not hypocrites. When President Clinton concealed his affair with Ms. Lewinsky, he may have perjured himself or obstructed justice, but he still did not become a hypocrite.
Hypocrisy is a much worse form of moral wrongdoing. It’s a certain kind of lying, and so can be done only consciously and intentionally. In particular, a man’s moral character comes from what he takes as his final end in life, his understanding of the human good, and the hypocrite is a man who dissembles about what he thinks this good is. The hypocrite pretends to accept and live by one set of values when, in fact, he accepts and lives by quite different ones. Thus a man who professes belief in the norm against adultery and seeks a reputation as a family man but all the while keeps a mistress, relishing his time with her and intending to keep her indefinitely, or at least until he can replace her with a yet more sexually attractive woman—this man is a hypocrite. So too the corporate executive who cultivates a reputation for honesty and lectures the business community on ethical issues but meanwhile engages in a scheme of financial fraud over many years, hoping to keep his ill-gotten gains when he retires to Bimini. Such people pretend to live in accordance with values that they do not hold and have no desire to hold. Their whole lives are lies, lies about what they think the human good is. That species of lying is hypocrisy.
Ted Haggard, I am sure, always believed that homosexual conduct was wrong, always wanted to avoid such conduct, and always regretted engaging in it after he did so. He found himself experiencing very powerful desires contrary to the values he sincerely believed in, desires he wished with all his heart he could have escaped from, desires he refers to as a “repulsive and dark” part of his life against which he has been warring for a long time. Sometimes, contrary to his wish, he gave in to those desires. This makes him weak, not a hypocrite.