How to Pick a President and not a Pastor
I'm no huge fan of Christianity Today magazine but the following article is worth the read. You should note that in regards to the kingdom of the Left (the civil world), according to this author we want virtue over policy. Better to have a man with backbone and poor policy, than a man with no spine and great ideas. Especially with our American system of checks-balances, the poor policy usually works itself out. But a leader without virtue isn't corrected by any amount of legal wrangling. This goes for both sides of the political isle. Policy is only good insofar as it compliments a virtuous character. Contrast this to the leadership of the Christian church, that is, the pastoral office. Here our policy is everything. The policy (Gospel) is inherently good, despite the lack of virtue of the office holder.  The opposite of political office is true. Policy must come first and virtuous character compliments it. In both cases, hypocrisy results from incongruity of policy and virtue. But where policy is born of virtue in civil leaders, with pastors virtue is born of the policy of the Word of God. The first is guided by reason and the second by faith. The first is imperfect due to sin and the later perfect due to its divine utterance. So the hypocrisy of the latter is more grievous because it doesn't offend man's character but offends God and His Word. How often do we hold a pastor's character in higher esteem than the message he brings? We rightly expect character first in our political leaders, so that their policy is born of a good heart. But the message your angel of God brings to you is true, despite his lack of virtue. He too confesses he is a poor, miserable sinner with the congregation. He too is in need of the forgiveness of Christ. We don't judge our pastors by the standard of virtue but rather by the standard of the forgiveness. Listen to the messenger. Is his voice the voice of the Good Shepherd? If so, forgive him for his lack of virtue and heed the call of your Lord.Â
How to Pick a President | Christianity Today | A Magazine of Evangelical ConvictionHow to Pick a PresidentWhy virtue trumps policy.Consider also how they respond to getting or losing power. Lincoln pointed out, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." Or take it away. Virtuous leaders hold on to power loosely. They share it easily. They encourage it in others. They see it as invested in healthy institutions, not in themselves personally. Unvirtuous, and therefore dangerous, leaders accumulate power for themselves (and their causes), use it to intimidate and manipulate, to reward and punish, and never release it voluntarily. Lyndon Johnson's abusive use of power as a Senator—in which he made loyalty to himself more important than either morality or ideology—hurt the nation.Yet another place to look is how candidates have dealt with adversity in their own lives. McCain survived torture with his honor intact (even while admitting he sometimes broke under torture), G. W. Bush had the fortitude and spiritual resources to defeat alcoholism. Franklin Roosevelt overcame the effects of polio. But of course all candidates have failures in their lives, too. If a candidate is given to private anger and pettiness, or has a history of broken personal relationships, does that tell us absolutely nothing about what kind of leader he or she might be? Is that none of our business, as some would say, or very much our business if that candidate is asking to be President?
The issue is not that candidates have failures, but how they have dealt with those failures. For they are certain to have public failures while in office. If in private life they run from failure or cover it up or rationalize it, are they not likely to do the same in public life? The goal of seeking virtuous people for high office is not to find perfect people, but to find people with the greatest potential to provide, despite their acknowledged limitations (humility being a prudent quality in a leader), the kind of leadership a community needs to flourish. We are not looking for saints to lead us, but we should be looking for people trying to live virtuously and largely succeeding.
It matters little that people will not agree exactly on a list of key virtues. The question of what virtues are most important, and how they should be defined and expressed, should be a fruitful part of an ongoing discussion. But it matters greatly that such a discussion take place. Recent polls indicate a broad recognition that we have a virtue deficit in this country and in its leaders that makes budget deficits pale in importance.
When we are choosing someone to lead us, we do best to look for a "good human being." Such a person is not likely to be moralistic or pious or politically correct. But he or she needs to be virtuous. Because, over time, nations flourish only to the degree that their collective virtue sustains.
